Research Article |
Fault Prognosis of Induction Motor Using Multi Resolution Current Signature Analysis
Author(s): Subash Kumar C S, Ravikrishna S, Sathiyanathan M and Arthy G
Published In : International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research (IJEER) Volume 12, Issue 1
Publisher : FOREX Publication
Published : 26 February 2024
e-ISSN : 2347-470X
Page(s) : 134-138
Abstract
There are various methods for the condition monitoring and this paper focuses on the multi resolution current signature analysis for fault prediction of induction motors. Variable frequency drives-based induction motors are used widely in industries. Monitoring the health of the motors is of great importance to reduce downtime and increase productivity. The multi resolution coefficients features from current signal are extracted using empirical wavelet transform. The extracted features are fed as input to artificial neural network to do prognosis on the data obtained for finding the condition of the motor. Hall Effect based system is used to measure the current signal and the features are extracted and trained to predict the condition of system using MATLAB in real time. The experimental findings reveal that the suggested technique achieves better accuracy in induction motor fault prognosis.
Keywords: Fault Prediction
, Neural Network
, Wavelet Transform
, Multi Resolution Empirical Wavelet Transform
, MATLAB
.
Subash Kumar C S*, PSG Institute of Technology and Applied Research; Email: css@psgitech.ac.in
Ravikrishna S, PSG Institute of Technology and Applied Research; Email: ravikrishna@psgitech.ac.in
Sathiyanathan M, PSG Institute of Technology and Applied Research
Arthy G, SNS College of Engineering; Email: arthytamil@gmail.com
-
[1] Thomson, W. T., &Fenger, M. (2001). Current signature analysis to detect induction motor faults. IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, 7(4), 26-34. DOI: 10.1109/2943.930988. [CrossRef]
-
[2] Miljković, D. (2015). Brief review of motor current signature analysis. HDKBR Info magazin, 5(1), 14-26. https://hrcak.srce.hr/148715.
-
[3] G. Niu, X. Dong and Y. Chen, "Motor Fault Diagnostics Based on Current Signatures: A Review," in IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 72, pp. 1-19, 2023, Art no. 3520919, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3285999.
-
[4] Mehrjou, M. R., Mariun, N., Marhaban, M. H., &Misron, N. (2011). Rotor fault condition monitoring techniques for squirrel-cage induction machine—A review. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25(8), 2827-2848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.05.007. [CrossRef]
-
[5] Barusu, M. R., &Deivasigamani, M. (2020). Non-invasive vibration measurement for diagnosis of bearing faults in 3-phase Squirrel cage induction motor using microwave sensor. IEEE Sensors Journal. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.3004515. [CrossRef]
-
[6] Yang, Z., Wu, J., Lu, C., & Wang, D. (2020). Predictive current control of a bearingless induction motor model based on fuzzy dynamic objective function. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 42(16), 3183-3195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331220944076. [CrossRef]
-
[7] Rayyam, M., & Zazi, M. (2020). A novel metaheuristic model-based approach for accurate online broken bar fault diagnosis in induction motor using unscented Kalman filter and ant lion optimizer. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 42(8), 1537-1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331219892142. [CrossRef]
-
[8] Zamudio-Ramirez, I., Osornio-Rios, R. A., Trejo-Hernandez, M., Romero-Troncoso, R. D. J., & Antonino-Daviu, J. A. (2019). Smart-sensors to estimate insulation health in induction motors via analysis of stray flux. Energies, 12(9), 1658. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091658. [CrossRef]
-
[9] Ye, Z., Wu, B., &Sadeghian, A. (2003). Current signature analysis of induction motor mechanical faults by wavelet packet decomposition. IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, 50(6), 1217-1228. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2003.819682. [CrossRef]
-
[10] Gangsar, P., & Tiwari, R. (2020). Signal based condition monitoring techniques for fault detection and diagnosis of induction motors: A state-of-the-art review. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 144, 106908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106908. [CrossRef]
-
[11] Borecki, M., Rychlik, A., Vrublevskyi, O., Olejnik, A., & Korwin-Pawlowski, M. L. (2021). Method of Non-Invasive determination of wheel rim technical condition using vibration measurement and artificial neural network. Measurement, 185, 110050. [CrossRef]
-
[12] Valtierra-Rodriguez, M., Rivera-Guillen, J. R., Basurto-Hurtado, J. A., De-Santiago-Perez, J. J., Granados-Lieberman, D., & Amezquita-Sanchez, J. P. (2020). [CrossRef]
-
[13] Convolutional Neural Network and Motor Current Signature Analysis during the Transient State for Detection of Broken Rotor Bars in Induction Motors. Sensors, 20(13), 3721. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133721. [CrossRef]
-
[14] Ziegler, S., Woodward, R. C., Iu, H. H. C., &Borle, L. J. (2009). Current sensing techniques: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 9(4), 354-376. DOI: 10.1109/SMC.2017.8123038. [CrossRef]
-
[15] Gaied, K. S. (2015). Wavelet-based prognosis for fault-tolerant control of induction motor with stator and speed sensor faults. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 37(1), 100-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/01423312145331 [CrossRef]
-
[16] Sun, Z., & Chang, C. C. (2002). Structural damage assessment based on wavelet packet transform. Journal of structural engineering, 128(10), 1354-1361. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:10(1354). [CrossRef]
-
[17] Gilles, Jerome. "Empirical wavelet transform." IEEE transactions on signal processing 61.16 (2013): 3999-4010. DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2013.2265222. [CrossRef]
-
[18] Zhang, X., Wang, J., Liu, Z., & Wang, J. (2019). Weak feature enhancement in machinery fault diagnosis using empirical wavelet transform and an improved adaptive bistable stochastic resonance. ISA transactions, 84, 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2018.09.022. [CrossRef]
-
[19] Akbari, H., & Ghofrani, S. (2020). Empirical Wavelet Transform; Stationary and Nonstationary Signals. Journal of Electronic & Information Systems, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.30564/jeisr.v1i2.1008. [CrossRef]
-
[20] Patel, J. P., & Upadhyay, S. H. (2016). Comparison between artificial neural network and support vector method for a fault diagnostics in rolling element bearings. Procedia engineering, 144, 390-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.148. [CrossRef]
-
[21] Verma, A. K., Nagpal, S., Desai, A., & Sudha, R. (2021). An efficient neural-network model for real-time fault detection in industrial machine. Neural Computing and Applications, 33(4), 1297-1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05033-z. [CrossRef]
-
[22] Hoang, D. T., & Kang, H. J. (2019). Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis using convolutional neural network and vibration image. Cognitive Systems Research, 53, 42-50.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.03.002. [CrossRef]
-
[23] Hsueh, Y. M., Ittangihal, V. R., Wu, W. B., Chang, H. C., & Kuo, C. C. (2019). Fault diagnosis system for induction motors by CNN using empirical wavelet transform. Symmetry, 11(10), 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11101212. [CrossRef]
-
[24] Shao, H., Jiang, H., Zhang, H., Duan, W., Liang, T., & Wu, S. (2018). Rolling bearing fault feature learning using improved convolutional deep belief network with compressed sensing. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 100, 743-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.08.002. [CrossRef]