Research Article |
Comprehensive Analysis of IoT with Artificial Intelligence to Predictive Maintenance Optimization for Indian Shipbuilding
Author(s): PNV Srinivasa Rao* and PVY Jayasree
Published In : International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research (IJEER) Volume 11, Issue 3
Publisher : FOREX Publication
Published : 23 September 2023
e-ISSN : 2347-470X
Page(s) : 800-807
Abstract
The extensive review of the literature evaluation on predictive maintenance (PdM) in this work focuses on system designs, goals, and methodologies. In the business world, any equipment or system failures or unscheduled downtime would negatively affect or stop an organization's key operations, possibly incurring heavy fines and irreparable reputational damage. Traditional maintenance methods now in use are plagued by a variety of limitations and preconceptions, including expensive preventive maintenance costs, insufficient or incorrect mathematical deterioration procedures, and manual feature extraction. The PdM maintenance framework is suggested as a new method of maintenance framework to prevent any damage only after the analytical analysis shows specific malfunctions or breakdowns, which is in line with the growth of digital building and the advancement of the Internet of Things (IoT), and Artificial Intelligence (AI), and so on. We also present an overview of the three main types of fault diagnosis and prognosis methods used in PdM mechanisms: scientific, conventional Machine Learning (ML), and deep learning (DL). While offering a thorough assessment of DL-dependent techniques, we make a quick overview of the knowledge-based and conventional ML-dependent strategies used in various components or systems. Eventually, significant possibilities for further study are discussed.
Keywords: Indian ship building
, Artificial intelligence
, Internet of Things
, Predictive Maintenance
.
PNV Srinivasa Rao*, Department of EECE, GITAM Institute of Technology, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam, India; Email: pnvsrinu@yahoo.com
PVY Jayasree, Department of EECE, GITAM Institute of Technology, GITAM University Visakhapatnam, India; Email: jpappu@gitam.edu
-
[1] Gong, X., & Qiao, W. (2014). Current-based mechanical fault detection for direct-drive wind turbines via synchronous sampling and impulse detection. IEEE. Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(3), 1693-1702.
-
[2] Bevilacqua, M., & Braglia, M. (2000). The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 70(1), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00047-8.
-
[3] Nguyen, K. A., Do, P., & Grall, A. (2015). Multi-level predictive maintenance for multi-component systems. Reliability engineering & system safety, 144, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.017.
-
[4] Wang, J., Zhang, L., Duan, L., & Gao, R. X. (2017). A new paradigm of cloud-based predictive maintenance for intelligent manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28(5), 1125-1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1066-0.
-
[5] Wang, H., & Pham, H. (2006). Reliability and Optimal Maintenance of Series Systems with Imperfect Repair and Dependence. Reliability and Optimal Maintenance, 91-110. DOI: 10.1007/1-84628-325-6_5.
-
[6] Mascaraque-Ramírez, C., & Para-González, L. (2022). Can the six dimensions of Marketing Promotion enhance performance in the international shipbuilding industry? Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 236(1), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/14750902211003004
-
[7] Jaison, M. (2021). Towards greater shipbuilding supply chain surplus in India–a review. Industrial Engineering Journal (ISSN-0970-2555), 14(1), 5-14.
-
[8] Priadi, A. A. (2022). Optimalization of Smart Technologies in Improving Sustainable Maritime Transportation. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 972, No. 1, p. 012084). IOP Publishing. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/972/1/012084.
-
[9] Bermeo-Ayerbe, M. A., Ocampo-Martinez, C., & Diaz-Rozo, J. (2022). Data-driven energy prediction modeling for both energy efficiency and maintenance in smart manufacturing systems. Energy, 238, 121691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121691.
-
[10] Kee, K. K., Yew, S. L. B., Lim, Y. S., Ting, Y. P., & Rashidi, R. (2022). Universal cyber physical system, a prototype for predictive maintenance. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 11(1), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v11i1.3216.
-
[11] Theodoropoulos, P., Spandonidis, C. C., & Fassois, S. (2022). Use of Convolutional Neural Networks for vessel performance optimization and safety enhancement. Ocean Engineering, 248, 110771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110771.
-
[12] Taşdemir, A., & Nohut, S. (2021). An overview of wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) in shipbuilding industry. Ships and Offshore Structures, 16(7), 797-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2020.1786232.
-
[13] Hiekata, K., & Zhao, Z. (2022). Decision Support System for Technology Deployment Considering Emergent Behaviors in the Maritime Industry. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020263.
-
[14] Liu, C., Zhu, D., Shi, S., Teng, L., Ding, Y., & He, J. (2022). Design of Environment Monitoring System on Shipbuilding Outdoor. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2168, No. 1, p. 012011). IOP Publishing. DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/2168/1/012011.
-
[15] Bachtiar, A., Marimin, M., Adrianto, L., & Bura, R. (2021). Determinants of shipbuilding industry competitive factors and institutional model analysis. Decision Science Letters, 10(2), 151-162. DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2020.11.004.
-
[16] Wahidi, S. I., Virmansyah, V. M., & Pribadi, T. W. (2021). Study on Implementation of Activity-Based Costing (ABC) System on Determination of Indirect Costs in Ship Production. Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan, 18(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.14710/kapal.v18i1.33000.
-
[17] Park, H. Y., & Lim, D. J. (2021). A design failure pre-alarming system using score-and vote-based associative classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 164, 113950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113950.
-
[18] Sahin, B., Yazir, D., Soylu, A., & Yip, T. L. (2021). Improved fuzzy AHP based game-theoretic model for shipyard selection. Ocean Engineering, 233, 109060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109060.
-
[19] Pribadi, T. W., & Shinoda, T. (2022). Hand Motion Analysis for Recognition of Qualified and Unqualified Welders using 9- DOF IMU Sensors and Support Vector Machine (SVM) Approach. Hand, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i1.4813.
-
[20] Ariany, Z., Pitana, T., & Vanany, I. (2022). Review of the Risk Assessment Methods for Shipbuilding in Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 972, No. 1, p. 012056). IOP Publishing. DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/972/1/012056.
-
[21] Caner, H. I., & Aydin, C. C. (2021). Shipyard site selection by raster calculation method and AHP in GIS environment, İskenderun, Turkey. Marine Policy, 127, 104439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104439.
-
[22] Yan, J., Meng, Y., Lu, L., & Li, L. (2017). Industrial big data in an industry 4.0 environment: Challenges, schemes, and applications for predictive maintenance. IEEE Access, 5, 23484–23491. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2765544.
-
[23] Wu, D., Jennings, C., Terpenny, J., Gao, R. X., & Kumara, S. (2017). A comparative study on machine learning algorithms for smart manufacturing: Tool wear prediction using random forests. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 139(7), Article 071018. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036350.
-
[24] Wu, D., Jennings, C., Terpenny, J., Gao, R., & Kumara, S. (2017). Data-driven prognostics using random forests: Prediction of tool wear. In vol. 3: Manufacturing equipment and systems. ASME, V003T04A048. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2017-2679.
-
[25] Wu, D., Jennings, C., Terpenny, J., Kumara, S., & Gao, R. (2017). Cloud-based parallel machine learning for prognostics and health management: A tool wear prediction case study. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 140(4).
-
[26] Wu, D., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Terpenny, J., Gao, R. X., Kurfess, T., & Guzzo, J. A. (2017). A fog computing-based framework for process monitoring and prognosis in cyber-manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 43, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.02.011.
-
[27] Lee, H. (2017). Framework and development of fault detection classification using IoT device and cloud environment. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 43, 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.02.007.
-
[28] Xia, M., Li, T., Liu, L., Xu, L., & de Silva, C. W. (2017). Intelligent fault diagnosis approach with unsupervised feature learning by stacked denoising autoencoder. IET Science Measurement and Technology, 11(6), 687–695. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-smt.2016.0423.
-
[29] Schmidt, B., Wang, L., & Galar, D. (2017). Semantic framework for predictive maintenance in a cloud environment. Procedia CIRP, 62, 583–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.06.047.
-
[30] Matyas, K., Nemeth, T., Kovacs, K., & Glawar, R. (2017). A procedural approach for realizing prescriptive maintenance planning in manufacturing industries. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 66(1), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.007.
-
[31] Qin, J., Liu, Y., & Grosvenor, R. (2018). Data analytics for energy consumption of digital manufacturing systems using internet of things method. In IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering (vol. 2017-Augus) (pp. 482–487). Xi’an, China: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/COASE.2017.8256150.
-
[32] Deutsch, J., & He, D. (2018). Using deep learning-based approach to predict remaining useful life of rotating components. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics: Systems, 48(1), 11–20. DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2697842.
-
[33] Ku, J. H. (2018). A study on prediction model of equipment failure through analysis of big data based on rhadoop. Wireless Personal Communication, 98(4), 3163–3176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4151-1.
-
[34] Ayad, S., Terrissa, L. S., & Zerhouni, N. (2018). An IoT approach for a smart maintenance. In 2018 International conference on advanced systems and electric technologies (pp. 210–214). Hammamet, Tunisia: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ASET.2018.8379861.
-
[35] Man, J., & Zhou, Q. (2018). Prediction of hard failures with stochastic degradation signals using wiener process and proportional hazards model. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 125, 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.015.
-
[36] Wang, J., Liu, C., Zhu, M., Guo, P., & Hu, Y. (2018). Sensor data based system-level anomaly prediction for smart manufacturing. In 2018 IEEE international congress on big data (pp. 158–165). San Francisco, CA, USA: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/BigDataCongress.2018.00028.
-
[37] Mulrennan, K., Donovan, J., Creedon, L., Rogers, I., Lyons, J. G., & McAfee, M. (2018). A soft sensor for prediction of mechanical properties of extruded PLA sheet using an instrumented slit die and machine learning algorithms. Polymer Testing, 69, 462–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.06.002.
-
[38] Saez, M., Maturana, F., Barton, K., & Tilbury, D. (2018). Anomaly detection and productivity analysis for cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. In IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering (vol. 2017-Augus) (pp. 23–29). Xi’an, China. DOI: 10.1109/COASE.2017.8256070.
-
[39] Kaur, K., Selway, M., Grossmann, G., Stumptner, M., & Johnston, A. (2018). Towards an open-standards based framework for achieving condition-based predictive maintenance. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on the internet of things (pp. 16:1–16:8). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3277593.3277608.
-
[40] Cho, S., May, G., Tourkogiorgis, I., Perez, R., Lazaro, O., de la Maza, B., & Kiritsis, D. (2018). A hybrid machine learning approach for predictive maintenance in smart factories of the future. In APMS 2018: Advances in production management systems. smart manufacturing for industry 4.0 (pp. 311–317). Seoul, Korea (Republic of): Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99707-0_39.
-
[41] Rúbio, E. M., Dionísio, R. P., & Torres, P. M. B. (2018). Industrial IoT devices and cyber-physical production systems: Review and use case. In HELIX 2018: Innovation, engineering and entrepreneurship (vol. 505) (pp.292–298). Guimarães, Portugal. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91334-6_40.
-
[42] Ren, L., Sun, Y., Cui, J., & Zhang, L. (2018). Bearing remaining useful life prediction based on deep autoencoder and deep neural networks. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.04.008
-
[43] Sezer, E., Romero, D., Guedea, F., MacChi, M., & Emmanouilidis, C. (2018). An industry 4.0-enabled low cost predictive maintenance approach for SMEs. In 2018 IEEE International conference on engineering, technology and innovation (pp. 1–8). Stuttgart, Germany: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICE.2018.8436307.
-
[44] Nemeth, T., Ansari, F., Sihn, W., Haslhofer, B., & Schindler, A. (2018). PriMa-X: A reference model for realizing prescriptive maintenance and assessing its maturity enhanced by machine learning. Procedia CIRP, 72, 1039–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.280.
-
[45] Yan, H., Wan, J., Zhang, C., Tang, S., Hua, Q., & Wang, Z. (2018). Industrial big data analytics for prediction of remaining useful life based on deep learning. IEEE Access, 6, 17190–17197. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2809681.
-
[46] Cipollini, F., Oneto, L., Coraddu, A., Murphy, A. J., & Anguita, D. (2018). Conditionbased maintenance of naval propulsion systems: Data analysis with minimal feedback. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 177, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.015.
-
[47] He, Y., Guo, J., & Zheng, X. (2018). From surveillance to digital twin: Challenges and recent advances of signal processing for industrial internet of things. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35(5), 120–129. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2018.2842228.
-
[48] Liu, J., An, Y., Dou, R., & Ji, H. (2018). Dynamic deep learning algorithm based on incremental compensation for fault diagnosis model. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 11(1), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.11.1.64.
-
[49] Amihai, I., Pareschi, D., Gitzel, R., Subbiah, S., Kotriwala, A. M., & Sosale, G. (2018). An industrial case study using vibration data and machine learning to predict asset health. In 2018 IEEE 20th conference on business informatics (pp. 178–185). Vienna, Austria: IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/CBI.2018.00028.
-
[50] Kiangala, K. S., & Wang, Z. (2018). Initiating predictive maintenance for a conveyor motor in a bottling plant using industry 4.0 concepts. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 97(9–12), 3251–3271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2093-8.
-
[51] Lamonaca, F., Sciammarella, P. F., Scuro, C., Carni, D. L., & Olivito, R. S. (2018). Internet of things for structural health monitoring. In 2018 Workshop on metrology for industry 4.0 and IoT (pp. 95–100). Brescia, Italy: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123092.
-
[52] Ardolino, M., Rapaccini, M., Saccani, N., Gaiardelli, P., Crespi, G., & Ruggeri, C. (2018). The role of digital technologies for the service transformation of industrial companies. International Journal of Productions Research, 56(6), 2116–2132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1324224.
-
[53] MacDermott, Á., Kendrick, P., Idowu, I., Ashall, M., & Shi, Q. (2019, June). Securing things in the healthcare internet of things. In 2019 Global IoT Summit (GIoTS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
-
[54] der Mauer, M. A., Behrens, T., Derakhshanmanesh, M., Hansen, C., & Muderack, S. (2019). Applying sound-based analysis at porsche production: Towards predictive maintenance of production machines using deep learning and internet-of-things technology. Digitalization cases: How organizations rethink their business for the digital age, 79-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95273-4_5.
-
[55] Killeen, P., Ding, B., Kiringa, I., & Yeap, T. (2019). IoT-based predictive maintenance for fleet management. Procedia Computer Science, 151, 607-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.184
-
[56] Zhang, W., Yang, D., Xu, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, J., & Gidlund, M. (2020). DeepHealth: A self-attention based method for instant intelligent predictive maintenance in industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(8), 5461-5473. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2020.3029551.
-
[57] Cheng, J. C., Chen, W., Chen, K., & Wang, Q. (2020). Data-driven predictive maintenance planning framework for MEP components based on BIM and IoT using machine learning algorithms. Automation in Construction, 112, 103087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103087.
-
[58] Hansen, E. B., & Bøgh, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and internet of things in small and medium-sized enterprises: A survey. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58, 362-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.08.009.
-
[59] Chen, J., Lim, C. P., Tan, K. H., Govindan, K., & Kumar, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence-based human-centric decision support framework: an application to predictive maintenance in asset management under pandemic environments. Annals of Operations Research, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04373-w.
-
[60] Jiang, Y., Dai, P., Fang, P., Zhong, R. Y., & Cao, X. (2022). Electrical-STGCN: An electrical spatio-temporal graph convolutional network for intelligent predictive maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(12), 8509-8518. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2022.3143148.
-
[61] Micheni, E., Machii, J., & Murumba, J. (2022, May). Internet of Things, Big Data Analytics, and Deep Learning for Sustainable Precision Agriculture. In 2022 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa) (pp. 1-12). IEEE. DOI: 10.23919/IST-Africa56635.2022.9845510
-
[62] Wang, H., Zhang, W., Yang, D., & Xiang, Y. (2022). Deep-Learning-Enabled Predictive Maintenance in Industrial Internet of Things: Methods, Applications, and Challenges. IEEE Systems Journal. DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2022.3193200.
-
[63] Farahani, B., & Monsefi, A. K. (2023). Smart and collaborative industrial IoT: A federated learning and data space approach. Digital Communications and Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2023.01.022.
-
[64] Xue, K., Yang, J., Yang, M., & Wang, D. (2023). An improved generic hybrid prognostic method for RUL prediction based on PF-LSTM learning. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 72, 1-21. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3251391.